The Women in Public Service Project and Wellesley
Anyone who follows Wellesley news is no doubt aware of the college’s involvement with the Women in Public Service Project. The many articles featuring photos of Secretary Clinton have spoken of “training a new generation of women leaders,” and the media surrounding the dual appearance of Secretaries Albright and Clinton on the Alumnae Hall stage was impossible to miss. However, the focus on our illustrious alumnae only conveys one part of what the Project stands for. Many WU contributors have posted legitimate fears about the direction of the WPSP (its role in perpetrating Western hegemony, its narrow conception of leadership, and the hypocrisy of an American institution teaching anyone about political parity when we have such low rates of female representation) but the inaugural WPSP Institute, hosted by Wellesley this June, set a precedent that should assuage many of these concerns. I had the privilege of working at the Institute as an intern, and though it wasn’t perfect, I am confident that the model created this summer addresses these issues and could even help push the rest of Wellesley in the right direction.
Reading the delegates’ bios in preparation, I worried that it was presumptive to think the program would teach such accomplished women anything new, and that it might be insulting to try, but the Institute was well designed and emphasized exchange rather than instruction. The star-studded speakers list included established leaders from around the world, not just the United States, and from a wide range of disciplines. From Pakistani human rights lawyer Hina Jilani to Cambodian opposition leader Mu Sochua to Egyptian children’s rights activist Moushira Khattab to civil rights defender and Obama mentor Charles Ogletree (with a solid representation of Wellesley alums and professors including Lynn Sherr, Farahnaz Ispahani, Henrietta Holsman Fore, Jean Kilbourne, Amb. Michele Sison and our two Secretaries of State) panelists offered their expertise and support, and genuinely strove for dialogue. They shared their own stories, but the sessions served less as trainings than as platforms for an exchange of best practices, and an opportunity for delegates to ask questions of women and men who had been in the field for years. When representatives of institutions like the World Bank, USAID, the State Department and American NGOs did speak, it was largely to present the resources that were available through their organizations. And delegates were not shy about asking incisive and critical questions, forcing those representing Western interests to answer for inaction in Syria, poor development models, or unjust foreign policy double standards.
Many of the most interesting contributions came from the delegates themselves, all representing countries in transition -the majority from those affected by uprisings in the Arab world- and all with impressive resumes. At the closing ceremony, former congresswoman Jane Harman said she doubted “there could be more power on the planet than there is right here in this room.” Illustrative of her point was an exchange during one question and answer session. When a delegate introduced herself as “the youngest female parliamentarian,” others immediately cut in, saying “No, Wafa, I’m younger than you.” She clarified that she meant the youngest in Jordan, not in the room. But despite the abundance of parliamentarians, the Institute embraced a wider understanding of the meaning of ‘public service.’ From foreign relations to academia, engineering to law, urban planning to community organizing, and healthcare to entrepreneurship, the common denominator among delegates was determination and commitment to their communities rather than any sort of leadership benchmark. Though I disagree with some of Hailey’s points in her recent post about the Albright Institute, I think she is correct that Wellesley should broaden its conception of what it means to be a leader, and the 48 delegates who attended the WPSP Institute offer a wide range of alternative models. Among other things, they’ve faced death threats to run for office in Afghanistan, created apprenticeships with local auto mechanics to empower young women in Kenya, drafted laws to protect journalistic freedoms in Kosovo, started taxi services to combat sexual harassment and assault in Iraq, participated in protests at Tahrir Square, defended the legal rights of minority populations in Israel, helped organize academic exchanges in Palestine, and founded NGOs to ensure women’s voices are heard during transition in Tunisia.
Perhaps the most valuable thing the WPSP can offer is connecting these women to one another. The Seven Sisters have a legacy of maintaining powerful networks among women, and this somewhat intangible asset is a unique way to offer our resources to women who are changing their own communities in the ways in which Wellesley encourages its students to. Delegates got the best and worst of the Wellesley experience- dining hall food and all- but the strong sense of community and ‘sisterhood,’ however trite that sounds, is one I think all Wellesley alums can appreciate. After all, there is no better place for cementing friendships than a dance party in the pub, another Wellesley experience WPSP delegates shared. For me certainly, and I hope for each other as well, the 2012 delegates will always be what one speaker, Lani Guinier, called a “network of accountability”: the people who will never let you settle into complacency. Who will always push you, by example or otherwise, to take chances, to try harder and to never forget what matters.
Wellesley’s 2012 Institute is just the first of many WPSP initiatives, including upcoming events in Bangladesh and France. The WPSP itself will move to the Wilson Center where it will reside permanently as part of the Global Women’s Leadership Initiative directed by Wellesley Centers for Women’s Rangita de Silva de Alwis.
Yes, despite America’s abysmal rates of female leadership the WPSP focus remains international, and continued healthy criticism will hold this institution accountable, but from what I saw in June, the WPSP is in good hands and Wellesley should be proud to be a founding member
-Rebecca Turkington ‘12
(Photos by Emma Li ‘12)For identification purposes:Top photo: right to left are speakers Dr. Moushira Khattab of Egypt, Dr. Haleh Esfandiari of Iran, Ambassador Michele Sison, Wellesley ‘81Middle Left: delegates Alma Lama of Kosovo, Gauhar Kasymzhanova of Kazakhstan, Esra Akyol of TurkeyMiddle Right: delegates Hayfa Rouas of Morocco, Khitam Naamneh of Israel, Howaida Nagy Mohamed of Egypt, and Bouthaina Attal of YemenBottom: delegates Sumaira Ishfaq of Pakistan and Jackcilia Ebere of South Sudan
— Nora Ephron in her 1996 commencement address at Wellesley College
(Source: new.wellesley.edu)
— Melissa Harris-Perry, Wellesley College Commencement 2012
On Tuesday, I had the privilege of seeing Former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, former World Bank President James Wolfensohn, and executive director of Amnesty International Suzanne Nossel on one stage, discussing the role of international organizations in the modern world. I was embarrassingly starstruck.
Memorable (and largely paraphrased) quotes include:
“The third largest nation is the Facebook nation. China, India, and Facebook.” -Albright
”The problem is, the American People don’t like the word ‘multilateralism.’ It has too many syllables and contains ‘ism.’” -Albright
On U.S. foreign policymakers referring to China as our “frenemy”: “I prefer the term ‘multifaceted.’” -Albright
On the actions the U.S. took in Libya: “Foreign policy is not consistent.” -Albright
“Can we get the people power and the institutional power to work in tandem?” -Nossel
When asked what sort of impact a Republican president would have on foreign policy and by extension, the U.N.: “It would be a disaster.” -Albright
Her response when asked at an event in Missouri how much longer she would spend blaming Obama’s problems on the previous presidency: “Forever.” -Albright
On engaging with Iran: “It’s very important to talk to people (and nations) you don’t like.” -Albright
“If changes are going to be made… They will be made not by
institutions, but by the people on the streets.” -Wolfensohn
When an alumna from the class of 1962 stood up: “One does survive!” -Albright
Anyway, I’m still reeling.
A Wellesley alumna’s response to the infamous Wesleyan article:
The real value of a single-sex education isn’t in removing men entirely, but removing people who disrespect women. That does create a situation that’s isn’t much like the ‘real world,’ but I know that I wouldn’t have the same commitment to women’s issues or understanding of the subtle ways sexism works if I didn’t have a glimpse of what life looks like without it. I started Wellesley as one of those girls who doesn’t really consider herself a feminist and ended up, well, here.
Definitely worth a read!
my favorite response by a fellow wellesley ‘09er:
“All women—at both coed and women’s colleges—must seek to empower themselves by challenging gender inequities. The first step is not to whine about these inequalities, but to deal directly with the men who impose them upon us. There is still a Real World, and it’s been easier to learn how to contend with it and with men at Wesleyan than at a women’s college.”
Pontificate all you want about hypotheticals, but the fact is that Wellesley graduates a disproportionate number of women in top positions in corporate America, which is still very much male-dominated. Wellesley has also graduated more female directors of Fortune 500 companies than any other college in the country (in case you missed the point, that includes Wesleyan) and many of those highly successful women credit the single-sex environment as an element of their success. Who’s doing more to “empower” and “contend”?
If we’re going to go all anecdotal in lieu of using actual data, I’d just say that my four years at Wellesley were absolutely fantastic, surrounded by women who sometimes were the only females to speak up during co-ed classes at MIT, were used to seizing what they wanted because ambition wasn’t seen as “bitchy” or “unfeminine”, and who were and are fiercely, fiercely loyal to their school and their sisters.
I’m sorry Bryn Mawr didn’t work out for you, but by your own admission you have no direct experience with Wellesley, choosing instead to make ludicrous cliches and misuse the word “literally”. I respect your choice to prefer co-ed; it’s my opinion as a Wellesley alum to say that (1) this is a poorly-written piece that reads as self-validation, (2) perhaps you should graduate first before making grand statements about “Real Life”, and (3) it’s downright stupid to write about something that you know nothing about beyond a single point of similarity.
-Linda “I chose Wellesley and didn’t even apply to Wesleyan” Yan
An alumna on Wellesley and the value of women’s colleges.
Street style in 1953. Wellesley College students photographed by Lisa Larsen.
Sidenote: I’m pretty sure the caps a couple of the girls are wearing are actually “beanies.” I don’t know how beanies are currently used at Wellesley but I hope some vestiges still exist. At my high school, which used to be a prep school for Wellesley, Senior girls give Junior girls beanies during one of our traditions as part of the passing on of seniority. The beanies are a formality now, since they’re only worn during this tradition, and it’s neat to see them being worn casually in this photo.
We still have beanies at Wellesley College for Awesome Awesome Women!
filoche said: HELL YEAH, FORENSICS! Does Wellesley do parli or policy or?
Parli! We’re part of the American Parliamentary Debate Association (APDA). :)
{Parli’s the best form of debate, in my opinion.}
So as most of you probably know, I started college on August 22nd! I’m officially in my fifth week of classes, so this is my sixth week at Wellesley.
The highlights:
- I’m taking four lovely courses. I really do enjoy them all.
- I turned eighteen and experienced my first hurricane. On the same day. Both events were relatively anticlimactic.
Also, fun fact: I was born two months premature in rural Illinois, and while my mother was in labor, the hospital experienced a bomb scare. So essentially, I entered the world with a bomb scare, and I entered adulthood with a hurricane. Thug lyfe. - I’m officially part of an a cappella group, which is super exciting for me! Because I love singing!
And automatic friends. - I’m also now a “baby novice” in the Wellesley Debate Society.
#forensicsswag for life. - I love Wellesley, but I do miss N.D. a lot. I’ve been listening to the “Tangled” soundtrack and creeping on the school website/Facebook page on the regular. It’s actually kind of embarrassing.
- People on the east coast smoke a lot. It’s been kind of unnerving. Like, why?
- And ending on a happy note: I’m going to visit a friend in Manhattan this weekend to see Chris Colfer’s talk for the New Yorker Festival! I’m sort of ridiculously excited.
P.S. I really missed Tumbling, guys!
Wellesley students Sarah East, Baron Henrietta Brannion (seriously, that’s her name), and a stalwart German Shepard try out the College’s first ice boat on Lake Waban.
— Hillary Clinton, about Wellesley College (via laurenknvn)
(Source: wellesley.edu, via laurenknvn)